#8 Legal Considerations in Critical Care
The intersection between patient care and the legal system can be a tricky one to navigate. Our duty as members of the healthcare team - irrespective of a patient’s social history - is to provide the best care we can, while protecting a patient’s privacy. Unfortunately, this can sometimes be easier said than done, and traveling such choppy waters can be challenging! Join Nick & Cyrus as they host Drs. Erin DeMartino & Matthew Griffith of Scopes and Shields for a case-based discussion which will hopefully equip you with some knowledge and tools for the next time you have a patient who is in custody or otherwise involved with the legal system.
Quick Take Home Points
Bookmark the Scopes & Shields Website - this is a great resource for understanding patients rights and your legal & ethical obligations as a health care provider. Consider this a “middle of the night” resource.
Terminology - avoid terms like inmate, convict, prisoner that define people in terms of their legal status.
Privacy - law enforcement officers (LEOs) are not covered by HIPAA; avoid discussing private or confidential information in front of LEOs to avoid breaching HIPAA. If necessary you can have hospital security come into the room (as hospital employees they are covered by HIPAA).
Testing - you must obtain patient consent for testing, regardless of criminal legal status of the patient. Healthcare providers are not required to perform any medically unnecessary procedures or tests, including phlebotomy for blood alcohol testing, when requested by LEO.
Restraints - shackles can cause pressure injuries and intimidate patients. Healthcare providers can request that shackles be removed or loosened. Pregnant women may not be placed in shackles under federal law.
Surrogate Decision Makers - Assuming they have capacity, people who are incarcerated or are in police custody have the right to make medical decisions for themselves or appoint surrogates.
Compassionate Release - physicians can advocate for the early release or parole of some incarcerated people of advanced age, with life-limiting illness, complex medical care needs or significant functional decline.”
Infographic:
Show Notes:
Context: High rates of incarceration in the US have significant health effects
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world; Over 1.2 million people are incarcerated in the US.
To put this another way, the US has about 4% of the worlds population, but 25% of incarcerated people worldwide are in US prisons/jails.
In Estelle v Gambel, the US Supreme Court found that “deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of prisoners constitute[d] the ‘unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain” and was a violation of he 8th amendment injunction against Cruel and unusual punishment.
While people in prisons are constitutionally guaranteed essential care, this has limitations. Despite the dedicated hardworking professionals who work in prisons, prison healthcare is limited. People who are in the criminal justice system are frequently brought to hospitals for medical care.
People in prisons may not be able to afford care. In most states, prisons charge copays for medical care. Quote from article:
“People held in jails and prisons are required to pay copays of $2–$5, even though they typically make between $0.14 to $0.63 per hour. That’s equivalent to a copay of hundreds of dollars for people making minimum wage.”
When people are released from prison they often lose access to healthcare. This can precipitate health and mental health crises.
The effect of mass incarceration is significant - It’s estimated that the high incarceration rate results in the overall US life expectancy being reduced by 1.5 years. Quote from a 2016 Study:
“from 1981 to 2007, the U.S. life expectancy would have increased by more than five years – from 74.1 to 79.4 years – if not for mass incarceration. But given the reality of mass incarceration, the U.S. life expectancy only increased 3.5 years over that time”
Defining terms
LEO - law enforcement official
HCP - healthcare provider
Many people are accompanied by LEO in the healthcare setting. This does not necessarily mean that they have been charged or convicted of a crime.
Custody - people may be in the custody of LEO. This does not necessarily mean that they have been convicted of a crime.
Jail - a county or city run facility for people who are not yet convicted or who are convicted but are serving a sentence less than 1 year (a misdemeanor).
Prison - a state or federal fun facility for people who are convicted and are serving a sentence longer than 1 year (a felony).
Convict, Prisoner, Inmate - we refrain from using common terms like “prisoner” and “inmate”, which define individuals by their current criminal status rather than who they are to us: our patients.
Case 1: Privacy
Regardless of criminal-legal status, law enforcement officers (LEO) are not privy to a patient’s protected health information (PHI) except in rare circumstances. Discussing PHI with a patient in the presence of LEO’s may be a breach of that patient’s privacy.
Healthcare providers (HCPs) are covered by HIPAA, and can only disclose PHI to the individual to whom the PHI belongs and to their choice of surrogates.
LEOs are NOT covered by HIPAA. Discussing protected health information in front of LEOs potentially constitutes a breach of HIPAA.
Hospital security officers are covered by HIPAA. Having hospital security officers present does not breach HIPAA.
To avoid violating privacy/confidentiality, HCPs should ask LEO to leave the room when communicating medical information or providing care (e.g. examination, procedure) if the HCP feels safe to do so. LEO are not bound by HIPAA, so anything observed or overheard is not protected. If necessary, hospital security officers can be present instead.
There are certain circumstances where HCPs can or must disclose private health information - these rules vary by state. See the Scopes and Shields Website for more.
Case 2: Avoiding potential Bias
In general, a persons history with law enforcement is not germane to medical care and can bias the care they receive.
AVOID asking or searching for information about specific crime that a patient is accused or convicted of, unless serving a specific medical purpose. This information may bias care delivery and should be avoided
Case 3: Testing
HCP cannot obtain testing without patient consent, regardless of criminal legal status of the patient.
A common exception: most states require consent for future blood alcohol testing to obtain a driver’s license, therefore no further consent is required
Other procedures performed without consent could constitute patient battery.
HCP are not legally required to carry out any medically unnecessary procedures or tests, including phlebotomy for blood alcohol testing, when requested by LEO.
Case 4: Restraints
Restraints can cause injury, especially in people w/ critical illness.
Restraints can lead to harm and intimidate patients. HCPs should demand removal of unnecessary non-medical restraints if they do not perceive a security or safety risk.
An estimated 58,000 pregnant people enter US jails/prisons each year. Federal law prohibits the use of non-medical restraints for pregnant women.
Case 5: Surrogate Decision Makers
Assuming they have capacity to make decisions in the context of their medical illness, people who are incarcerated or are in police custody have the right to make medical decisions for themselves or appoint surrogates.
Unless explicitly permitted by local law, LEO should not be participate in medical decision making for a criminal-legal involved patient who lacks capacity.
Case 6: Compassionate Release
Definition: “Compassionate release is a process that allows for the early release or parole of some incarcerated people of advanced age, with life-limiting illness, complex medical care needs or significant functional decline.”
Providers can advocate for compassionate release for individuals with terminal diagnoses or advance stage chronic conditions that cannot be reasonably managed in a jail/prison.
DISCLAIMER: This is intended only for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Check relevant state laws & hospital policies. Consult www.scopesandshileds.org for more information.
Audio
Video
-
Aslan et al, Health Care in U.S. Correctional Facilities — A Limited and Threatened Constitutional Right, NEJM 2023
Wildeman, Incarceration & Population Health in Wealthy Democracies, Criminology 2016
Neimann, Is it morally permissible for hospital nurses to access prisoner-patients’ criminal histories? Nursing Ethics 2016
Haber et al, Shackling in the Hospital. J Gen Internal Med 2022
Rorvig & Williams, Providing Ethical and Humane Care to Hospitalized, Incarcerated Patients With COVID-19. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021
Kanbergs et al, A stepwise guide for healthcare professionals requesting compassionate release for patients who are incarcerated. Int J Prison Health. 2022
-
[none]
-
Scopes & Shields a great resource for information about caring for people in the criminal justice system